Goblessed

might be Alexa or Jupiter ratings. When dealing with less accurate measurements like that, simply increase your sample size or compare more distant extremes (Alexa rankings in the top 100 vs Alexa ranking in the 99,900-100,000 traffic rankings). More inbound links? Once again you can use open logs and look at referral entriesà or you can trust the link: command at MSNà or something less reliable like the link: command at Google (once again, just increase your sample size and/or compare more distant extremes in number of inbound links). How about profitability? This is my favorite. This is why most of us are here. I used this measurement for my Glyphius software and all of the copywriting statistical studies posted on my blog and in the Statistical Copywriting Online Home Study Course. How can you get the profitability figures for other web-sites? Are they just going to turn them over? Actually, public companies do just that. You could use something like that public data. Also, many aff...

elements pertaining to appearance, general behavior and particularly consumption. Then, back in those days, if you knew one element of a particular cluster, you could quite easily guess the others. But all this has changed. As people are becoming gradually more individualistic, and as possibilities have multiplied, people have become less and less definable as types. First of all, let's face it, our consumer refuses almost completely to abide by segments that create homogeneous groups (heterogeneous from others) according to demographic, socio-economic variables, or even according to lifestyle. Our customer will not behave and consume under our stereotypical forecasts. He is a "collector", and therefore I call him the "eclectic consumer". He likes the old (Frank Sinatra), as well as the new (fast internet), the expensive (BMW) as well as the economical (hardware do-it-yourself stores), the international (Giorgio Armani) as well as the locally rooted (folk dancin...